Office of System-wide Internal Audit

Office of System-wide Internal Audit

INSTRUCTIONS

Speaker and Session Evaluation

Technical/Formatting

General Questions

SWIA Training Evaluation Questionnaire

2019 Spring

INSTRUCTIONS

Auditor's Conference Survey

INSTRUCTIONS

Speaker and Session Evaluation

General Questions

Audit Process

You are here

Internal Audit Retreat Evaluation Questionnaire

INSTRUCTIONS

Speaker and Session Evaluation

Technical/Formatting

General Questions

SWIA Training Evaluation Questionnaire

2019 Spring

INSTRUCTIONS

Auditor's Conference Survey

INSTRUCTIONS

Speaker and Session Evaluation

General Questions

Audit Process

Pages

October 13-14, 2020 and October 20-21, 2020

2022 Auditor's Conference Survey

October 13-14, 2020 and October 20-21, 2020

2022 Auditor's Conference Survey

URL Alias:

audit

Read more about External Quality Assurance Review

Institution *

1) The internal audit activity is perceived as adding value and helping our organization accomplish its objectives.

2) Internal audit activity staff has free and unrestricted access to records, information, locations, and employees during the performance of their engagements.

3) Internal audit activity staff communicates effectively (oral, written, and presentations).

4) Internal audit activity staff displays adequate knowledge of the business processes, including critical success factors.

5) The internal audit activity management sufficiently communicates its audit plans to management of areas being reviewed. This includes descriptions of audit objectives and scope of review.

6) The internal audit activity management adequately assesses the effectiveness of risk management processes employed by management to achieve objectives.

7) Internal audit activity audit reports are accurate, objective, clear, concise, constructive, complete, and timely.

8) The internal audit activity demonstrates sufficient knowledge of key information technology risks and controls in performing its audit engagements.

9) The internal audit activity demonstrates sufficient knowledge of fraud to identify “red flags”, indicating possible fraud when planning its engagements.

Leave this field blank

Mr. Batson has been the TBR Chief Audit Executive since June 2017, guiding internal audit, consulting services, and investigations for the system and its colleges. He began his professional career as a Legislative Auditor with the Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury, Division of State Audit. He became an internal auditor at Tennessee State University and later spent two years as the fiscal officer for TSU's then Center of Excellence for Research and Policy on Basic Skills. In 2000, he returned to TSU’s Department of Internal Audit as the director.

Participant Name (optional):

How is your school classified?

Years in present position:

Please rate aspects of the retreat on a 0 to 5 scale:

0 = N/A
1 = Strongly disagree, or the lowest, most negative impression
2 = Somewhat disagree
3 = Neither agree nor disagree, or an adequate impression
4 = Somewhat agree
5 = Strongly agree, or the highest, most positive impression

Choose N/A if the item is not appropriate or not applicable to this retreat.

Your feedback is sincerely appreciated. Thank you.

Leonard Vona – Fraud Testing & Fraud Data Analytics

Heidi Wachs/Rumbi Petrozzello, Michael Borgia – Information Security

John Grimes – Investigative Interview Techniques

Ashley Blamey, Christina Moradian – Title IX Compliance

Ashley Blamey, Tiffany Baker Cox, Odell Fearn – Title IX Panel Discussion

Johnathan Button – CARES Act

Which technology platform did you prefer WebEx or Zoom?

WebEx

Zoom

No preference. The platforms are similar.

Strongly disagree. I had a lot of technical issues.

Select your favorite two aspects of this virtual event?

Virtual platform that I could attend from anywhere

Content of the training sessions

Networking event - virtual game night

Panel discussion session

Quality of speakers

Please provide any other information you believe will be helpful in evaluating this program.

Leave this field blank

Read more about Internal Audit Retreat Evaluation Questionnaire

Participant Name (optional):

Years in present position:

Please rate aspects of the retreat on a 0 to 5 scale:

0 = N/A
1 = Strongly disagree, or the lowest, most negative impression
2 = Generally disagree
3 = Neither agree nor disagree, or an adequate impression
4 = Generally agree
5 = Strongly agree, or the highest, most positive impression

Choose N/A if the item is not appropriate or not applicable to this retreat. Your feedback is sincerely appreciated. Thank you.

Ratings

	0	1	2	3	4	5
The sessions were well-managed by the TBR training committee.	The sessions were well-managed by the TBR training committee. - 0	The sessions were well-managed by the TBR training committee. - 1	The sessions were well-managed by the TBR training committee. - 2	The sessions were well-managed by the TBR training committee. - 3	The sessions were well-managed by the TBR training committee. - 4	The sessions were well-managed by the TBR training committee. - 5
I was well-informed about the objectives of the sessions.	I was well-informed about the objectives of the sessions. - 0	I was well-informed about the objectives of the sessions. - 1	I was well-informed about the objectives of the sessions. - 2	I was well-informed about the objectives of the sessions. - 3	I was well-informed about the objectives of the sessions. - 4	I was well-informed about the objectives of the sessions. - 5
The session instructors were well-trained and knowledgeable about their topics.	The session instructors were well-trained and knowledgeable about their topics. - 0	The session instructors were well-trained and knowledgeable about their topics. - 1	The session instructors were well-trained and knowledgeable about their topics. - 2	The session instructors were well-trained and knowledgeable about their topics. - 3	The session instructors were well-trained and knowledgeable about their topics. - 4	The session instructors were well-trained and knowledgeable about their topics. - 5
The instructors provided sufficient and relevant lecture instruction to meet the objectives of the training program.	The instructors provided sufficient and relevant lecture instruction to meet the objectives of the training program. - 0	The instructors provided sufficient and relevant lecture instruction to meet the objectives of the training program. - 1	The instructors provided sufficient and relevant lecture instruction to meet the objectives of the training program. - 2	The instructors provided sufficient and relevant lecture instruction to meet the objectives of the training program. - 3	The instructors provided sufficient and relevant lecture instruction to meet the objectives of the training program. - 4	The instructors provided sufficient and relevant lecture instruction to meet the objectives of the training program. - 5
The sessions lived up to my expectations.	The sessions lived up to my expectations. - 0	The sessions lived up to my expectations. - 1	The sessions lived up to my expectations. - 2	The sessions lived up to my expectations. - 3	The sessions lived up to my expectations. - 4	The sessions lived up to my expectations. - 5
The content was relevant to my job.	The content was relevant to my job. - 0	The content was relevant to my job. - 1	The content was relevant to my job. - 2	The content was relevant to my job. - 3	The content was relevant to my job. - 4	The content was relevant to my job. - 5
The program’s instructors were interested in and responsive to student questions and concerns.	The program’s instructors were interested in and responsive to student questions and concerns. - 0	The program’s instructors were interested in and responsive to student questions and concerns. - 1	The program’s instructors were interested in and responsive to student questions and concerns. - 2	The program’s instructors were interested in and responsive to student questions and concerns. - 3	The program’s instructors were interested in and responsive to student questions and concerns. - 4	The program’s instructors were interested in and responsive to student questions and concerns. - 5
The pace of the training was appropriate.	The pace of the training was appropriate. - 0	The pace of the training was appropriate. - 1	The pace of the training was appropriate. - 2	The pace of the training was appropriate. - 3	The pace of the training was appropriate. - 4	The pace of the training was appropriate. - 5
I will be able to use what I learned in this training.	I will be able to use what I learned in this training. - 0	I will be able to use what I learned in this training. - 1	I will be able to use what I learned in this training. - 2	I will be able to use what I learned in this training. - 3	I will be able to use what I learned in this training. - 4	I will be able to use what I learned in this training. - 5
The facility met my expectations.	The facility met my expectations. - 0	The facility met my expectations. - 1	The facility met my expectations. - 2	The facility met my expectations. - 3	The facility met my expectations. - 4	The facility met my expectations. - 5
The food provided met my expectations.	The food provided met my expectations. - 0	The food provided met my expectations. - 1	The food provided met my expectations. - 2	The food provided met my expectations. - 3	The food provided met my expectations. - 4	The food provided met my expectations. - 5
Overall, the program met my expectations.	Overall, the program met my expectations. - 0	Overall, the program met my expectations. - 1	Overall, the program met my expectations. - 2	Overall, the program met my expectations. - 3	Overall, the program met my expectations. - 4	Overall, the program met my expectations. - 5

Are you interested in having a training session this summer, or would you prefer a conference call for the July IAD meeting?

Training

Conference Call

What were the best things about this program?

How could this program be improved?

Any suggestions for topics and/or speakers for future training?

Thank you for your feedback. We value your opinion.

Tennessee Board of Regents System-wide Internal Audit Training Committee

Leave this field blank

Read more about SWIA Training Evaluation Questionnaire

Participant Name (optional):

How is your school classified?

Years in present position:

Please rate aspects of the retreat on a 0 to 5 scale:

Choose N/A if the item is not appropriate or not applicable to this retreat.

Your feedback is sincerely appreciated. Thank you.

Kevin Callaghan - Record Retention

Jeff White & Chase Tramel - Technology Audits and Risks

Janet McHard - Audits Which Turn Into Investigations, Managing Fraud Risks, Ethics Game, Case Studies

Jackie Struckmeyer - Group Discussion - President's Expense Reporting Audits

Mike Batson - Group Discussion - Audit Mindset

Mark Ortlieb - Audit Share - Bookstore Investigation

Tammy Wiseman - Audit Share - Using Power BI, Data Analytics, and Continuous Monitoring

Would you be willing to speak on a topic at a future conference? (Y/N)

Yes

If Yes, Proposed speaking topic

Select your favorite two aspects of this event.

Content of the training sessions

Networking event - Effifel Tower Excursion

Networking event - Movie Pictionary

Location

Quality of speakers

What venue (location) do you prefer for these auditor's conferences?

State Park

Hotel

What location if you chose Hotel?

Please provide any other information you believe will be helpful in evaluating this conference.

Leave this field blank

Read more about Auditor's Conference Survey

Internal Auditing- Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes. - Definition of Internal Auditing, Institute of Internal Auditors

The session instructor(s) was(were) well-trained and knowledgeable about the topics.

Were the stated learning objectives (summary of presentation) met?

Were program materials, if any, relevant and did they contribute to the achievement of the learning objective?

Was/were the presenter(s) effective?

I will be able to use what I learned in this training in my job.